Now in its sixth month, President Trump's administration has become the antithesis of progress, many LGBTQ Americans say. Donald Trump has enacted a trump of anti-LGBTQ+ executive orders, many of which specifically target the trans community, just a week in. A s the reality of President-elect Donald Trump’s victory begins to settle, LGBTQ+ rights groups and individuals are grappling with the realities of what that means—especially now that he peoples.
Much is still unknown about how Trump will carry out some of his big promises on issues like the economy and immigration, or how he may curb abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights. Project and what he’s said so far offer some clues. On the campaign trail, Donald Trump has been outlining what he plans to do if elected in November. That includes rolling back the rights of millions of LGBTQ+ people.
It’s part of a wider. Trump also signed an order banning gender-affirming carewhich can include medical, surgical and mental health services, for anyone under the age of Lucy Middleton Updated: April 16, States have adopted laws criminalizing their health care, attempting to ban them from public life, and will threatening gay remove transgender youth from families that love and affirm them.
Socioeconomic Inclusion In Data: Where do international students study and what's changing? Throughout this political onslaught, the ACLU, our nationwide affiliate network, and our millions of members have remained stalwart in defense of the basic principle that all people deserve the freedom to be themselves and every state should be a safe place to raise every family.
Such a discriminatory policy would also violate the Equal Protection Clause because it should be subjected to heightened trump protection scrutiny, and there is no justification for excluding transgender people from service. Implications: If facilities or providers believe HHS is excessively engaged in oversight of their practice of this area of medicine, it could have a chilling effect on willingness to provide these treatments.
It is that people harder today because of the viewpoints of the judges and justices Trump appointed to the federal courts and Supreme Court. The ACLU has convinced courts to reject such claims in the past, and we will continue to fight against them should a new Trump administration try these arguments again. Many of these bans allow for what forms of sex testing that put all female student athletes at risk and open the door for any school official or adult to question and harass young women.
The decision in Skrmetti v. In addition to rolling back existing protections, a second Trump administration will proactively mandate discrimination by the federal government wherever it can. These programs — and similar ones at a much larger scale — exemplify the kind of support for and investment in the health of transgender people that will become necessary at the state level in a second Trump administration.
Second, a new Trump administration would not only roll back existing protections, but proactively require discrimination by the federal government wherever it can, including by banning transgender people from serving openly in the Armed Forces and blocking gender-affirming medical care for transgender people in federal health care programs such as Medicare.
By enacting policies supporting a religious right to be exempt from workplace nondiscrimination laws, a second Trump administration could create uncertainty will the enforceability of nondiscrimination gay against those who have religious objections to LGBTQ people.
Jun Related Content. We can, and must, show up for trans youth in the courts and in our communities. Because just a small share of the population is transgender, and not all trans people seek medical intervention, costs are likely very low. Across the country in recent years, transgender people and their families have been targeted by a relentless assault on their rights, their safety, and their fundamental freedom to be themselves.
Donate to the ACLU. Most Read. CMS issued a press release along with the letter. While a second Trump administration would likely announce its view that these federal civil rights statutes do not protect LGBTQ people, the courts ultimately will decide this question. A second Trump administration would attempt to halt gender-affirming medical care for adolescents nationwide by threatening to deny Medicaid funding for hospitals that provide that care, asserting — against the recommendations of all major medical associations — that it does not meet federal health and safety standards.
Overtransgender people under 18 now live in a state with a ban on their health care. Clayton CountyU. Implications: Section prohibits recipients of federal funding, including publicly-subsidized health payers and health care providers who accept Medicare or Medicaid, from discriminating against people on the basis of disability.
There have been multiple legal challenges to this Order with some judicial actions that have paused aspects of implementation: On February 4, a lawsuit was filed in federal court challenging the Order on the grounds that it usurps Congressional power, violates Sec. In some cases, gender affirming care may have helped to connect clients with HIV services and thus improve HIV outcomes.
Copyright ©blowbag.pages.dev 2025